Analytical Methods
Comprehensive methodological details on phytochemical analysis of Ilex guayusa Scientific name of the Guayusa plant. First described in 1901 by Theodor Loesener. Synonyms: Ilex guayusa var. macrophylla.Ilex guayusa
- Overview
- Sample Preparation
- HPLCMethods
HPLC
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography - standard method for quantitative analysis of polyphenols and alkaloids in Guayusa. Typical method: C18 column, acetonitrile gradient, UV detection at 280 nm.
More Info - LC-MS/MSMethods
LC-MS/MS
Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry - highly sensitive method for identification and quantification of secondary metabolites. Used for saponin and polyphenol analysis in Guayusa.
More Info - GC-MSfor Volatile Compounds
GC-MS
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - analytical method for identifying volatile compounds. Used for analyzing aroma substances in Guayusa.
More Info
This page is intended for scientists, analysts and professionals. It contains detailed methodological information on the analysis of guayusa constituents.
Overview of Analytical Methods
The phytochemical characterization of Ilex guayusa requires a combination of different analytical techniques. The choice of method depends on the target compound, the matrix, and the required sensitivity.
| Method | Target Compounds | LOD | Analysis Time | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPLC-DAD | Polyphenols, Caffeine | 0.1-1 μg/mL | 30-60 min | €€ |
| HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn | Polyphenols (Structural Elucidation) | 0.01-0.1 μg/mL | 45-90 min | €€€ |
| LC-MS/MS (QqQ) | Alkaloids, Saponins | 0.001-0.01 μg/mL | 15-30 min | €€€€ |
| GC-MS | Volatile Compounds | 0.01-0.1 ng/mL | 30-45 min | €€€ |
| UV-Vis Spectroscopy | Total Polyphenols (TPC) | 1-10 μg/mL | 5-10 min | € |
| NMR | Structural Elucidation | 1-10 mg | 1-4 h | €€€€€ |
Sample Preparation
Sample preparation is critical for reproducible and accurate results. Guayusa leaves contain high concentrations of Polyphenols, which are sensitive to oxidation.
Standard Protocol for Polyphenol Analysis (García-Ruiz et al. 2017)
Materials
- Freeze-dried guayusa leaves (ground, <0.5 mm)
- Extraction solvent: Methanol/water (70:30, v/v) + 1% formic acid
- 0.45 μm PVDF filter (Millex HV13, Millipore)
- Ultrasonic bath (40 kHz)
- Centrifuge (9,500 × g)
Protocol
- Weighing: 100 mg freeze-dried powder in 15 mL Falcon tube
- Extraction 1: Add 1 mL extraction solution, vortex (30 s)
- Ultrasound 1: 60 min at room temperature in ultrasonic bath
- Incubation: Overnight at 4°C
- Ultrasound 2: Again 60 min in ultrasonic bath
- Centrifugation: 9,500 × g, 5 min, room temperature
- Filtration: Supernatant through 0.45 μm PVDF filter
- Storage: At 4°C in the dark, max. 48 h before analysis
Recovery Rates
| Compound Class | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic Acids | 94.2 ± 3.1 | 3.3 |
| Flavonols | 91.8 ± 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Catechins | 88.5 ± 5.1 | 5.8 |
| Caffeine | 98.7 ± 1.2 | 1.2 |
Carotenoid Extraction (Stinco et al. 2016)
Protocol
- Weighing: 10 mg freeze-dried powder
- Extraction 2: 500 μL hexane/acetone, vortex, centrifuge
- Extraction 1: 1 mL hexane/acetone (1:1, v/v), vortex, centrifuge (18,000 × g, 3 min)
- Water removal: 1 mL MilliQ water, vortex, centrifuge (18,000 × g, 3 min), discard
- Pooling: Combine organic phases
- Saponification: Methanolic KOH (30 g/100 mL), 1 h at RT in the dark
- Washing: With water until pH neutral
- Evaporation: Vacuum concentrator, <30°C
- Dissolution: In 100 μL ethyl acetate
- Storage: Under N₂ at -20°C
Critical Factors
- Oxidation: Polyphenols oxidize quickly → formic acid as antioxidant, storage at 4°C in the dark
- Light: Carotenoids are photolabile → work in dim light, amber glass
- Temperature: Enzymes can degrade Polyphenols → freeze-drying or immediate extraction
- pH value: Affects stability and extraction → pH 2-3 optimal for Polyphenols
HPLC Methods
HPLC-DAD für Quantifizierung
High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Detector is the standard method for quantification of Polyphenols and Caffeine.
Instrument Setup (García-Ruiz et al. 2017)
- System: Agilent 1220 Infinity LC
- Pump: Binary gradient pump
- Autosampler: Injection volume 20 μL
- Column oven: 30°C
- Detector: DAD, 200-600 nm
Chromatographic Conditions
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Column | Luna C18 (25 cm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Phenomenex) |
| Guard Column | C18, 4 × 3 mm |
| Mobile Phase A | Water + 0.1% Formic Acid |
| Mobile Phase B | Methanol + 0.1% Formic Acid |
| Flow Rate | 1.0 mL/min |
| Injection Volume | 20 μL |
| Column Temperature | 30°C |
| Run Time | 60 min |
Gradient Program
| Time (min) | %A (Water) | %B (Methanol) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 95 | 5 |
| 5 | 90 | 10 |
| 15 | 80 | 20 |
| 25 | 70 | 30 |
| 35 | 60 | 40 |
| 45 | 40 | 60 |
| 50 | 20 | 80 |
| 55 | 5 | 95 |
| 60 | 95 | 5 |
Detection Wavelengths
| Compound Class | λmax (nm) | Quantification at |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxycinnamic acids (chlorogenic acids) | 325 | 330 nm |
| Flavonols (Quercetin, Kaempferol) | 365 | 360 nm |
| Catechins | 280 | 280 nm |
| Caffeine | 272 | 272 nm |
| Anthocyanins (if present) | 520 | 520 nm |
Calibration
External calibration with standard substances:
| Standard | Concentration Range (μg/mL) | R² | Linearity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid (5-CQA) | 1-100 | 0.9998 | Excellent |
| Rutin (Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside) | 0.5-50 | 0.9996 | Excellent |
| Epicatechin | 0.5-50 | 0.9992 | Excellent |
| Caffeine | 5-500 | 0.9999 | Excellent |
HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn für Strukturaufklärung
Coupling of HPLC with mass spectrometry enables the identification of unknown compounds through fragmentation patterns.
MS Parameters (García-Ruiz et al. 2017)
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Mass spectrometer | Agilent Ion Trap (G2445A) |
| Ionization | Electrospray (ESI) |
| Mode | Negative ionization |
| Capillary temperature | 350°C |
| Capillary voltage | 4 kV |
| Nebulizer pressure | 65 psi |
| N₂ flow rate | 11 L/min |
| Scan range | m/z 100-1200 |
| Collision gas | Helium |
| Collision energy | 0.3-2.0 V (ramping) |
Example: Identification of Quercetin-3-O-hexoside
- Retention time: 32.4 min
- UV spectrum: λmax 256, 355 nm (typical for flavonol)
- [M-H]⁻: m/z 463
- MS² (463): m/z 301 [M-H-162]⁻ (loss of hexose)
- MS³ (301): m/z 179, 151 (typical Quercetin fragmentation pattern)
- Identification: Quercetin-3-O-glucoside or -galactoside
Characteristic Fragmentations
| Compound Class | Characteristic Neutral Losses | Typical Fragments |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic Acids | -162 (quinic acid), -176 (caffeoylquinic acid) | m/z 191 (quinic acid), 179 (caffeic acid) |
| Quercetin Glycosides | -162 (Hexose), -146 (Rhamnose), -308 (Rutinoside) | m/z 301 (Quercetin Aglycone) |
| Kaempferol Glycosides | -162 (Hexose), -146 (Rhamnose) | m/z 285 (Kaempferol Aglycone) |
| Catechins | -152 (Gallate) | m/z 289 (Epicatechin), 139 (Gallic acid) |
LC-MS/MS Methods (Triple Quadrupole)
For highly sensitive quantification of Alkaloids and Saponins, LC-MS/MS with triple quadrupole mass spectrometers in Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) mode is used.
Caffeine Quantification (Krieger et al. 2016)
LC Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Column | Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) |
| Mobile Phase A | 0.1% formic acid in water |
| Mobile Phase B | 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile |
| Flow Rate | 0.4 mL/min |
| Injection Volume | 5 μL |
| Run Time | 5 min |
MS/MS Parameters (MRM Mode)
| Analyte | Precursor Ion (m/z) | Product Ion (m/z) | Collision Energy (eV) | LOQ (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caffeine | 195.1 [M+H]⁺ | 138.1 (Quantifier) | 20 | 5 |
| Caffeine | 195.1 [M+H]⁺ | 110.1 (Qualifier) | 25 | - |
| Theobromine | 181.1 [M+H]⁺ | 138.1 | 18 | 10 |
| Paraxanthine (IS) | 181.1 [M+H]⁺ | 124.1 | 22 | - |
Method Validation
| Parameter | Caffeine | Theobromine |
|---|---|---|
| Linearity (R²) | 0.9998 | 0.9995 |
| LOD (ng/mL) | 1.5 | 3.0 |
| LOQ (ng/mL) | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| Intra-day Precision (RSD%) | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| Inter-day Precision (RSD%) | 4.2 | 5.9 |
| Recovery (%) | 97.3 ± 3.1 | 94.8 ± 4.5 |
| Matrix Effect (%) | -8.2 | -12.5 |
Saponin Analysis (Chianese et al. 2019)
Triterpene Saponins require special ionization conditions and fragmentation strategies.
MRM Transitions for Ilex Saponins
| Saponin | [M-H]⁻ (m/z) | Main Fragment (m/z) | CE (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ilexsaponin A | 927.5 | 455.3 (Aglycone) | 35 |
| Ilexsaponin B | 911.5 | 455.3 (Aglycone) | 35 |
| Ursolic acid | 455.3 | 407.3 [M-H-CO₂]⁻ | 25 |
| Oleanolic acid | 455.3 | 407.3 [M-H-CO₂]⁻ | 25 |
GC-MS for Volatile Compounds
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry is used for the analysis of volatile aroma components in Guayusa.
Headspace-SPME-GC-MS
SPME Conditions
- Fiber: DVB/CAR/PDMS (50/30 μm, Supelco)
- Sample temperature: 60°C
- Extraction time: 30 min
- Desorption: 250°C, 3 min in GC injector
GC-MS Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Column | DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm) |
| Carrier Gas | Helium, 1.0 mL/min (constant) |
| Injector Temperature | 250°C |
| Injection Mode | Splitless |
| Oven Program | 40°C (3 min) → 5°C/min → 250°C (5 min) |
| Transfer Line | 280°C |
| Ion Source | EI, 70 eV, 230°C |
| Scan range | m/z 35-350 |
Identified Volatile Compounds
| Compound | RT (min) | Relative Abundance (%) | Odor Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linalool | 18.3 | 12.4 | Floral, citrus-like |
| α-Terpineol | 19.7 | 8.2 | Lilac, woody |
| Geraniol | 21.2 | 6.5 | Rose-like |
| β-Ionone | 28.4 | 5.1 | Violet, woody |
| Hexanal | 8.9 | 4.8 | Grassy, green |
| (E)-2-Hexenal | 10.2 | 3.9 | Green, leafy |
Spectroscopic Methods
UV-Vis Spectrophotometry
Folin-Ciocalteu Method (Total Phenolic Content)
Kolorimetrische Bestimmung des Gesamtpolyphenolgehalts.
Protocol
- 0.5 mL extract (or standard) in 15 mL tube
- Add 2.5 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (diluted 1:10)
- Incubate 2 min at RT
- Add 2 mL Na₂CO₃ solution (75 g/L), mix
- Incubate 15 min at 50°C
- Cool to RT
- Measure absorbance at 750 nm
Calibration
- Standard: Gallic acid
- Concentration range: 10-90 mg/L
- Linearity (R²): 0.9997
- Result: mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) / g dry weight
NMR Spectroscopy
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy for structural elucidation of isolated compounds.
Standard Conditions
| Parameter | ¹H-NMR | ¹³C-NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 150 MHz |
| Solvent | CD₃OD, DMSO-d₆ | CD₃OD, DMSO-d₆ |
| Temperature | 25°C | 25°C |
| Sample Amount | 1-5 mg | 5-20 mg |
| Measurement Time | 10-30 min | 2-8 h |
2D-NMR Techniques
- COSY: ¹H-¹H correlations
- HSQC: ¹H-¹³C correlations (1 bond)
- HMBC: ¹H-¹³C correlations (2-3 bonds)
- NOESY: Spatial proximity of protons
Antioxidant Capacity
ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity)
Fluorescence-based method for measuring antioxidant capacity.
Protocol (96-Well Microplate)
- Prepare Reagents:
- Fluorescein: 1 μM in Phosphatpuffer (pH 7,4)
- AAPH: 250 mM in phosphate buffer
- Trolox standards: 10-200 μM
- Pipetting Scheme:
- 150 μL Fluorescein in jedes Well
- 25 μL sample/standard/blank
- Incubation 15 min at 37°C
- Add 25 μL AAPH (start of reaction)
- Measurement:
- Fluoreszenz alle 2 min für 120 min
- Excitation: 485 nm, Emission: 520 nm
- Temperature: 37°C
- Calculation:
- AUC (Area Under Curve) für jede Probe
- Net AUC = AUC_sample - AUC_blank
- Result: μmol Trolox equivalents / g
Typical ORAC Values
| Sample | ORAC (μmol TE/g DW) |
|---|---|
| Guayusa (fresh) | 127.8 ± 8.3 |
| Guayusa (fermented) | 101.2 ± 7.1 |
| Green Tea | 80-100 |
| Yerba Mate | 90-120 |
DPPH assay
Schnelle spektrophotometrische Methode.
Microplate Protocol
- 250 μL DPPH solution (in methanol) in each well
- Add 2 μL sample/standard
- Incubate 50 min at RT in the dark
- Measure absorbance at 515 nm
- Calculation: % inhibition = [(A_blank - A_sample) / A_blank] × 100
FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power)
Misst die Reduktionskraft von Antioxidantien.
FRAP Reagent
- Acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6): 25 mL
- TPTZ (10 mM in 40 mM HCl): 2.5 mL
- FeCl₃·6H₂O (20 mM): 2.5 mL
- Mix fresh before use, warm to 37°C
Procedure
- 10 μL sample + 300 μL FRAP reagent
- Incubate 4 min at 37°C
- Measure absorbance at 593 nm
- Calibration with FeSO₄ (100-1000 μM)
- Result: μmol Fe²⁺ equivalents / g
Method Validation
Validierung analytischer Methoden nach ICH Q2(R1) Richtlinien.
Validation Parameters
1. Specificity/Selectivity
- Proof that the method measures only the target analyte
- No interferences from matrix or other compounds
- Test: Analysis of blank, standard, sample; check peak purity
2. Linearity
| Criterion | Requirement | Guayusa Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient (R²) | ≥ 0.995 | 0.9992-0.9999 |
| Number of Calibration Points | ≥ 5 | 6-8 |
| Concentration Range | 80-120% of target concentration | 50-150% |
| Residuals | Randomly distributed | ✓ |
3. Precision
| Type | Conditions | RSD Requirement | Guayusa Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeatability | Same day, same analyst | < 5% | 1.2-4.6% |
| Intermediate Precision | Different days | < 10% | 3.3-5.9% |
| Reproducibility | Different laboratories | < 15% | Not tested |
4. Accuracy
- Recovery: 90-110% (for major components)
- Method: Spike-recovery experiments
- Guayusa data: 88.5-98.7%
5. Limit of Detection and Quantification
| Parameter | Definition | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| LOD (Limit of Detection) | Lowest detectable amount | 3.3 × σ / S |
| LOQ (Limit of Quantification) | Lowest quantifiable amount | 10 × σ / S |
σ = standard deviation of response, S = slope of calibration curve
6. Robustness
Insensitivity of the method to small variations:
- pH of mobile phase (±0.2)
- Flow rate (±10%)
- Column temperature (±5°C)
- Wavelength (±2 nm)
- Different columns (same type, different batches)
7. Stability
| Stability Type | Conditions | Guayusa Results |
|---|---|---|
| Autosampler Stability | 4°C, 48 h | Stable (<5% degradation) |
| Bench-top Stability | RT, 6 h | Polyphenols: -8%, Caffeine: stable |
| Freeze-Thaw Stability | 3 cycles | Stable (<10% degradation) |
| Long-term Stability | -20°C, 6 months | Stable (<10% degradation) |
Quality Control
Ensuring data quality through systematic QC measures.
QC Samples
| QC Type | Concentration | Frequency | Acceptance Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 0 | Each sequence (start) | No peaks at analyte RT |
| LLOQ (Lower LOQ) | LOQ | Each sequence | 80-120% of nominal concentration |
| QC Low | 3 × LOQ | Every 10 samples | 85-115% |
| QC Mid | Middle of the range | Every 10 samples | 85-115% |
| QC High | 80% of upper limit | Every 10 samples | 85-115% |
System Suitability Test (SST)
To be performed before each sequence:
| Parameter | Requirement | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Retention time reproducibility | RSD < 1% | 6 injections of a standard |
| Peak area reproducibility | RSD < 2% | 6 injections of a standard |
| Resolution (Rs) | > 1.5 | Rs = 2(tR2 - tR1) / (w1 + w2) |
| Tailing factor (Tf) | < 2.0 | Tf = (a + b) / 2a |
| Theoretical plate number (N) | > 2000 | N = 16 (tR / w)² |
Documentation
- Sample preparation: Protocol with date, analyst, batch numbers
- Instrument logbook: Maintenance, column changes, problems
- Calibration curves: Equation, R², residual plot
- QC charts: Levey-Jennings diagrams for trend monitoring
- Out-of-Specification (OOS): Documentation and investigation of deviations
Reference Materials
| Standard | Purity | Source | Storage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caffeine | ≥ 99% | Sigma-Aldrich | RT, dry |
| Chlorogenic acid (5-CQA) | ≥ 95% | Sigma-Aldrich | -20°C, dry |
| Rutin | ≥ 94% | Sigma-Aldrich | -20°C, dry |
| Epicatechin | ≥ 98% | Sigma-Aldrich | -20°C, dry |
| Trolox | ≥ 97% | Fluka | RT, dry |
Latest Methods & Studies (2024–2026)
Newer work (2024–2026) mainly improved workflows and green processing: chlorogenic-acid profiling, Untargeted metabolomics, and extraction/purification techniques.
- Methods: Chlorogenic-acid workflow (J Chromatogr A 2026, PMID: 41604851): HPLC-UV (5-CQA) + LC-MS/MS, feature-based Molecular networking, and Chemometrics.
- Methods: Untargeted metabolomics (Food Chemistry 2026, PMID: 41643380): GC-EI-MS, 205 metabolites annotated; leaf age and light as key drivers.
- Processing/methods: Supercritical antisolvent (Molecules 2024, PMID: 39598698): chlorogenic acids concentrated, Caffeine selectively <1% w/w; encapsulation with PVP.
- In press: Sustainable extraction with compressed fluids (DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2025.106801).
- In press: Subcritical water extraction for functional ingredients (DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2026.102338).
Garzón, T., et al. (2026)
Integrated HPLC-UV validation and LC-MS/MS optimization with molecular networking Computational approach (e.g., GNPS) that connects MS/MS spectra by similarity. This helps reveal families of related compounds and supports annotation of unknowns. Application of statistical (often multivariate) methods (e.g., PCA, HCA, PLS-DA) to chemical measurement data (HPLC/LC-MS/GC-MS). Helps classify samples, identify markers, and explain why profiles differ. Botanical genus of hollies with about 400-600 species worldwide. This genus includes Ilex guayusa, Ilex paraguariensis (Mate), and Ilex vomitoria (Yaupon).molecular networking
chemometrics
Ilex
PMID: 41604851. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2026.466732
- Setup: HPLC-UV validation for 5-CQA plus optimized UPLC-MS/MS (FastDDA) with post-acquisition raw-data merging; feature-based Molecular networking and Chemometrics (PCA/volcano/HCA).
- Key findings: Target quantification achieved LOQ 0.25 mg/L and r²≈0.998 for 5-CQA. Raw-data merging increased detected features by 43%. Chemical differences were driven most by geographic location, then sunlight exposure and plant age.
- Notes: QC implication: combine targeted markers (e.g., 5-CQA) with untargeted profiling; track origin/light/age as key metadata for comparability.
Pastuña-Fasso, J.V., et al. (2026)
Influence of plant age and sunlight exposure on the volatile profile and metabolomic pathways of Ilex guayusa leaves used in the traditional Amazonian beverage
PMID: 41643380. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2026.148238
- Setup: Untargeted metabolomics of aqueous extracts via GC-EI-MS; identification using MZmine, MS-DIAL, eRah, and MSHub/GNPS; compared plant age and light vs shade.
- Key findings: 205 metabolites annotated (multiple confidence levels). Phenolics were higher under light exposure while lipids predominated in shade; pathway mapping suggested shifts in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, tyrosine metabolism, and fatty-acid degradation.
- Notes: Supports that cultivation parameters (age, shade management) are analytically visible and should be controlled or documented for standardization.
Meneses, M.Á., et al. (2024)
Green Processing of Ilex guayusa: Antioxidant Concentration and Caffeine Purine alkaloid with stimulating effects on the central nervous system. Guayusa contains 1.7-7.6% caffeine (dry weight), depending on variety, location, and processing.Caffeine
PMID: 39598698. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29225309
- Setup: Supercritical antisolvent (SAE) processing of an ethanolic extract (80–150 bar, 35–45°C) with optional co-precipitation using PVP (1:1 to 1:2 w/w).
- Key findings: Optimized at 120 bar/45°C: chlorogenic acids concentrated (43.02 → 237 mg/g) while Caffeine was reduced to <1% w/w; PVP increased yield >2× and enabled microparticle formation (encapsulation).
- Notes: Ingredient/processing context, not brewed tea. Relevant for analytics because such products are not directly comparable to leaf infusions and require appropriate QC markers.
In press (2026)
Towards sustainable extraction of bioactive compounds Chemical substances in plants with physiological effects on the human organism. Guayusa contains over 100 identified bioactive compounds.bioactive compounds
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2025.106801
- Setup: In press: comparative study on compressed fluids for sustainable extraction of Bioactive Compounds from guayusa.
- Key findings: From the title: compares performance of compressed-fluid approaches for extraction; see paper (DOI) for process windows and metrics.
- Notes: Without a freely available abstract, only cautious, title-based context is included here. Add details once accessible.
In press (2026)
Subcritical water extraction of Ilex guayusa for regulatory-compliant neuro-metabolic functional ingredients
DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2026.102338
- Setup: In press: subcritical water extraction aiming at regulatory-compliant neuro-metabolic functional ingredients from guayusa.
- Key findings: From the title: uses water under subcritical conditions as a green solvent, with a focus on regulatory compliance; see paper (DOI) for targets and parameters.
- Notes: Without a freely available abstract, only a high-level categorization is possible. Add concrete process parameters once accessible.
Wichtige Literatur für Analytiker
- García-Ruiz, A., et al. (2017). Guayusa (Ilex guayusa L.) new tea: phenolic and carotenoid composition and antioxidant capacity. J Sci Food Agric, 97(12), 3929-3936. [Umfassende HPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn-Methode]
- Krieger, D.R., et al. (2016). The safety, pharmacokinetics, and nervous system effects of two natural sources of caffeine. Clin Transl Sci, 9(5), 246-251. [LC-MS/MS für Koffein-Pharmakokinetik]
- Stinco, C.M., et al. (2016). RRLC-DAD-APCI-MS analysis of carotenoids. Food Chem, 211, 876-883. [Carotinoid-Analytik]
carotenoids
Fat-soluble plant pigments with antioxidant effects. Guayusa contains β-carotene (0.8-1.2 mg/100g), lutein (5.2-7.8 mg/100g), and zeaxanthin.
More Info - Chianese, G., et al. (2019). Phytochemical analysis of Ilex guayusa. Il Farmaco, 74(1), 85-93. [Saponin-Charakterisierung mit NMR und MS]
- ICH Q2(R1). (2005). Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. [Validation guidelines]
Discover GUYA
Experience authentic Guayusa from Ecuador with a transparent supply chain and direct support for the Kichwa communities.
To GUYA - drinkguya.com →